[
review]
Rating: * * * *
OscarStars: Philip Seymour Hoffman, Catherine Keener, Chris Cooper
Directed by: Bennett Miller
Country: USA
Programme: Special Presentations
Song Synopsis: " You're the real thing/Even better than the real thing." - U2, Even Better Than The Real Thing
(click photo for source)
we picked our movies with an effort to cross a few genres and to avoid any movies that would be released.
Capote was an exception as I wanted to see an English language movie and
In Cold Blood is one of my favourite piece of American literature of that time.
finally completed in 1965,
In Cold Blood was a genre bending recounting of the viscous murders of the Clutter family and its aftermath. in the small rural town of Holcomb, Kansas, Perry Smith and Dick Hickcock attempted to rob the farming family but ended up killing them all when they failed to find the money. when the book was published, it had made
Truman Capote one of the most well-known and important writer of American letters. it was a non-fiction novel, fictionalizing the murders based on Capote’s interviews with the killers, the townspeople and the the authorities. the movie, however, is also based on the biography by Gerald Clarke.
in the movie, we watch Capote struggle to capture the essence of the crime in the book, watch the subtle change of his relationship with Perry as it oscillates between subject and friend, all the while navigating through his own relationship between fame, love, friendship, through his lover Jack Dunphy and friend Harper Lee.
what captivated me about the novel was the bending of fact and fiction. it was like a gothic novel written in the sixties. it reads like non-fiction, but is so pivotally drawn up as fiction that you cannot forget that it is Truman Capote’s words we read, and if you know Truman Capote, you know that the words are poetic but not objective. the constant play of fact and fiction goes to the heart of what I find fascinating in fiction, because it plays on our sense of truth, our viewpoints, it’s a play on structure, too. we never know what is true because we can never know everything.
I wanted to know how such a play would work using the grammar of film. I’ve only had one viewing, so I may have missed something, but I didn’t feel that the film structure was all that interesting. in
Elephant,
Gus Van Sant was brilliant with the way he handled the disparate characters and their viewpoints through the way it was filmed, while we watched the massacre unfold. in contrast with
Capote, the strength lies with the actors' portrayals of real life people and characters. the performances were quiet and restrained. no over the top oscar moments. Philip Seymour Hoffman did a splendid job as Truman Capote, making him both funny and moving. the tension between fact and fiction was more aptly demonstrated by Capote’s lying to Perry about their friendship and his need for material to finish his novel.
overall the movie was quite good and subtle. no irritating oscar-baiting moments (though it does have oscar-begging written all over it). but perhaps this restraint also holds it back too. a crime so violent, a piece of literature so controversial, a writer so adored and scandalized, this restraint seems to underwhelm the very passion that made all of the fact and fiction so alive in the novel. still, I highly recommend the movie, four out of five stars, mostly for the performances.

unfortunately, the beautiful Elgin theatre was too dark to take clear photos with my crappy cellphone, but these blobs are really Bennet Miller (director), Clifton Collins Jr. (Perry Smith), Catherine Keener (Nelle Harper Lee) and of course, Philip Seymour Hoffman (Capote). the screenplay was done by
Dan Futterman, on whom I have a crush since watching him in the movie
Urbania. don't ask me why I think he's cute. I have no idea.

“They really did travel far for this!” - Bennett Miller, as he introduced the long line of people who had a hand in the movie, which also had its world premiere at the film festival. Unfortunately, no Q&A.